Topic summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 10,546 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Climate Solutions results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 5.1% saturation with 2,129 hits . Analysis detected 25,568 faulty-reasoning hits from 42,121 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,031 of 15,407 topics). This Climate Solutions is better (less manipulative) than 97.60% of the peer group. Climate Solutions
Topic details
Total words: 42,121
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.4% percentile 1.2% BS Score7 analyzed articles42.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst