Author summary
26% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,215 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jake Bittle results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,429 hits . Analysis detected 16,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,890 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 13% (5,379 of 6,172 authors). This Jake Bittle is better (less manipulative) than 87.10% of the peer group. Jake Bittle
Author details
Total words: 22,890
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
13% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.9% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles22.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst