Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maddie Stone results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 2,458 hits . Analysis detected 17,046 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,984 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 7% (5,830 of 6,244 authors). This Maddie Stone is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Maddie Stone
Author details
Total words: 25,984
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles26K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.2% 0.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst