Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,738 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Case Jernigan results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 481 hits . Analysis detected 4,691 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (5,058 of 6,365 authors). This Case Jernigan is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Case Jernigan
Author details
Total words: 6,952
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst