Topic summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos4,268 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civic Duty results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 15.9% saturation with 3,966 hits. Analysis detected 20,613 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,878 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (12,345 of 15,448 topics). This Civic Duty is better (less manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group.
Civic Duty
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 24,878
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

20% percentile
025507510020.1% percentile
1.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles24.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.0%8.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.9%15.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.7%5.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 1.4%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate