Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 8,529 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Dunn Tenpas results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 3,228 hits . Analysis detected 18,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 34,116 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 5% (6,298 of 6,628 authors). This Kathryn Dunn Tenpas is better (less manipulative) than 95.00% of the peer group. Kathryn Dunn Tenpas
Author details
Total words: 34,116
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.0% percentile 1.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles34.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst