Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 973 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jay Cost results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 637 hits . Analysis detected 4,202 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,892 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 56% (2,801 of 6,364 authors). This Jay Cost is worse (more manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Jay Cost
Author details
Total words: 3,892
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 56.0% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.8% 9.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Indoctrination: Author 16.4%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst