Topic summary
21% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,217 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charter Schools results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 2,595 hits . Analysis detected 20,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,900 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 5% (14,777 of 15,447 topics). This Charter Schools is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Charter Schools
Topic details
Total words: 27,900
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles27.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.4% 6.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst