Author summary
67%3 analyzed articles/videos1,199 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zach Kessel results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 2,293 hits. Analysis detected 10,143 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,101 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,192 of 6,170 authors). This Zach Kessel is worse (more manipulative) than 64.50% of the peer group.
Zach Kessel
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
65%Zach Kessel (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 8,101
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510064.5% percentile
3.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.9%10.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 28.3%28.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.2%13.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Author 7.7%7.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Author 28.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Author 10.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Author 11.5%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Horn Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateAuthor rate