Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 4,183 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maria Benevento results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 762 hits . Analysis detected 5,244 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,528 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 3% (6,158 of 6,348 authors). This Maria Benevento is better (less manipulative) than 97.00% of the peer group. Maria Benevento
Author details
Total words: 13,528
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.0% percentile 1.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.4% 4.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst