Topic summary
51% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,775 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Business Practices results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 2,637 hits . Analysis detected 19,299 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,826 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (11,162 of 16,475 topics). This Business Practices is better (less manipulative) than 67.70% of the peer group. Business Practices
Topic details
Total words: 17,826
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 14.8% 14.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 14.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst