Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video116 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Christian results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 168 hits. Analysis detected 882 faulty-reasoning hits from 348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 15.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠98% (143 of 6,279 authors). This Emily Christian is worse (more manipulative) than 97.70% of the peer group.
Emily Christian
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠98%Emily Christian (selected)16%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 348
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

98% percentile
025507510097.7% percentile
15.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles348 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 48.3%48.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 30.8%30.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 18.7%18.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 11.2%11.2%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 9.8%9.8%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 11.2%11.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 9.8%9.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 8.6%8.6%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 9.8%9.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Author 48.3%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 30.8%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Author 30.2%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Author 21.0%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 18.7%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Author 11.2%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Author 9.8%, sitewide 1.7%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.8%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Author 9.8%, sitewide 2.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 9.8%, sitewide 0.3%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 8.6%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos