Bougie NYC bakery denies woman’s claims that she caught them selling Costco croissants for much higher price 79%

By Lillian Gissen69%

7/24/2026, 9:00:47 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 23.5% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 1,138 faulty-reasoning hits from 494 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.5% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,657 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the article peer group.

A bougie New York City bakery has denied a woman's accusation that they stocked croissants from Costco - and resold them to customers for a much higher price. 
The woman, named Sreenitya, explained in a TikTok video earlier this week that she was at Le Parisien Bakery in Manhattan when she witnessed a man delivering some desserts to the French-themed cafe. 
She shared footage of a guy carrying in multiple boxes of what appeared to be prepackaged croissants and placing them on the floor inside the shop. 
Sreenitya alleged that one of the boxes had a Costco logo on it. 
The video went viral, sparking immense scrutiny for the bakery, as many viewers accused them of 'ripping customers off' and presenting premade treats as freshly baked goods. 
A worker from Le Parisien Bakery has insisted to the Daily Mail, however, that they do not get any products from Costco and that their croissants are made fresh. 
The employee explained that they had simply 're-used Costco boxes' during a delivery from the company's production site in Coney Island. 
'We have a company [production site] in Coney Island, they bring [the croissants] to us every morning,' they said. 
'They just re-use the boxes. 
They're not Costco croissants.' 
In the video, Sreenitya raged: 'I can't believe this. 
We're at this little cafe and we got this pistachio croissant for $12.' 
'I was like, this is insane for a price. 
And look at this,' she said, before flipping the camera to show the delivery man. 
'This delivery guy just came in. 
The croissants are from Costco. 
Absolutely insane. 
Don't come here, I don't recommend.' 
On Le Parisien's website, the bakery said it 'prides itself on offering products of the highest quality.' 
'Every item on our menu is meticulously crafted with care and expertise, using traditional recipes handed down through generations,' it adds. 
'Indulge in our house-made pastries, where each bite is a testament to our commitment to excellence. 
'From flaky croissants to delicate tarts, our bakery items are crafted with precision and love, ensuring an authentic taste that transports you to the streets of Paris.' 
It also boasts about using 'skilled artisans' and 'the finest ingredients' in its items. 
A box of 12 croissants on Costco's website costs just $6.80, which comes out to roughly $0.57 per croissant. 
A plain croissant at Le Parisien Bakery is $5. 
It comes weeks after famed California health food store Erewhon went viral for selling $12 'sacred water.' 
The herbal tonic, which retails for $12 and is available at the store's tonic bars, is a blend of grape juice, coconut milk, coconut water and jasmine tea, 'delicately layered' with holy basil, anise, cardamom and raw honey. 
The drink is sold in a 12oz cup, which means that each sip costs approximately $0.50 - and some fans weren't too impressed with the new and costly concoction. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 5.9%Lillian Gissen: 4.5%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias5.9%This article: 8.3%Lillian Gissen: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias8.3%This article: 15.0%Lillian Gissen: 6.3%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic15.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 2.6%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Lillian Gissen: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias1.8%This article: 9.1%Lillian Gissen: 11.1%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect9.1%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.9%Lillian Gissen: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.7%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Lillian Gissen: 1.2%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias3.6%This article: 19.6%Lillian Gissen: 28.2%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias19.6%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.9%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 2.7%Daily Mail: 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 19.2%Lillian Gissen: 6.9%Daily Mail: 4.6%Halo Effect19.2%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.9%Lillian Gissen: 3.6%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias8.9%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 1.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 10.5%Lillian Gissen: 5.0%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority10.5%This article: 3.8%Lillian Gissen: 2.7%Daily Mail: 1.1%False Dilemma3.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.3%Lillian Gissen: 15.0%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization8.3%This article: 9.3%Lillian Gissen: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring9.3%This article: 5.5%Lillian Gissen: 4.6%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon5.5%This article: 12.8%Lillian Gissen: 16.9%Daily Mail: 7.6%Appeal to Emotion12.8%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.4%Lillian Gissen: 3.0%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.9%Lillian Gissen: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.6%Burden of Proof5.9%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.8%Lillian Gissen: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division3.8%This article: 23.5%Lillian Gissen: 5.1%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal23.5%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.3%Lillian Gissen: 2.0%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.3%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 2.2%Lillian Gissen: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity2.2%This article: 4.3%Lillian Gissen: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading4.3%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.7%Daily Mail: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Lillian Gissen: 12.8%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 1.8%Lillian Gissen: 4.5%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 3.4%Lillian Gissen: 18.5%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice3.4%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lillian Gissen: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 19.2%Lillian Gissen: 2.6%Daily Mail: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…19.2%

494 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers47%attributed speech262writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 33 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSreenitya • 13 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 5 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 2 words • 0.0% coverageSreenitya • 6 words • 0.0% coverageLe Parisien • 17 words • 100.0% coverageLe Parisien • 21 words • 100.0% coverageLe Parisien • 16 words • 100.0% coverageLe Parisien • 27 words • 100.0% coverageLe Parisien • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Le Parisien

100%flagged-word coverage
95 attributed words41% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Attempt to Sell a Product +100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Le Parisien: 100.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote-11.1 ptsWriter: 11.1%Le Parisien: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.5 ptsWriter: 6.5%Le Parisien: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.