Keyword summary
92% 1 analyzed article/video 494 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Le Parisien Bakery Manhattan Costco Croissants Response results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 274 hits . Analysis detected 1,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,482 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 77% (8,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Le Parisien Bakery Manhattan Costco Croissants Response is worse (more manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group. Le Parisien Bakery Manhattan Costco Croissants Response
Keyword details
Total words: 1,482
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.6% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst