Topic summary
⁠73%5 analyzed articles/videos3,317 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumerism results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,413 hits. Analysis detected 15,324 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,637 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (11,159 of 16,251 topics). This Consumerism is better (less manipulative) than 68.70% of the peer group.
Consumerism
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 15,637
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510031.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos