Topic summary
69% 9 analyzed articles/videos 6,449 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Artemis Program results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 3,559 hits . Analysis detected 20,779 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,712 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,910 of 15,974 topics). This Artemis Program is better (less manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Artemis Program
Topic details
Total words: 25,712
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles25.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 13.8% 13.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst