Artemis II splashes down off the coast of San Diego, finishing historic journey around the moon 0%

By Addie Davis0%

4/10/2026, 5:20:58 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Optimism Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 67 hits. Analysis detected 137 faulty-reasoning hits from 664 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,886 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

NASA’s Artemis II crew in their Orion spacecraft is back on Earth. 
They successfully completed a parachute-assisted splashdown in the Pacific Ocean off the coast of San Diego at 8:07 p.m. 
EDT (5:07 p.m. 
PDT). 
(Photo via NASA) 
OAN Staff Addie Davis 
Friday, April 10, 2026 
5:20 PM: The Orion capsule carrying the Artemis II crew safely splashed down off the coast of San Diego at 5:07 p.m. local time, officially completing the journey that took humans farther into space than ever before. 
NASA said engineers will conduct additional tests while the spacecraft is in the water before powering it down and handing it over to the recovery team, which is on site aboard the USS John P. 
Murtha and headed to the capsule to assist the crew. 
After being extracted by the combined NASA and U.S. military recovery team and taken aboard the Navy ship, they will undergo medical evaluations prior to being taken to shore. 
3:16 PM: The Artemis II crew is expected to splash down off the coast of San Diego, California, today, marking the completion of their historic trip around the moon. 
Splashdown is scheduled to occur at 5:07 p.m. local time (Pacific Standard Time), according to NASA. 
A combined NASA and U.S. military recovery team will extract the crew from the Orion spacecraft after landing in the Pacific, helping them onto an inflatable raft, and then using helicopters to fly them to the USS John P. 
Murtha. 
After being taken ashore, aircraft will then fly the crew to NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston. 
According to the U.S. 
Geological Survey, you might be able to hear or feel the sonic boom as the spacecraft reenters the atmosphere if you’re in Southern California, though NASA scientists noted it’s not likely you would be able to see the splashdown, per NBC 7 San Diego. 
On their mission blog that provides updates of Artemis II, NASA detailed the experiences of the planned reentry. 
Roughly half an hour before splashdown, Orion’s crew module will separate from the service module, exposing its heat shield for reentering the Earth’s atmosphere, where the spacecraft is expected to encounter temperatures of around 3,000 degrees Fahrenheit. 
A burn will then be conducted in order to set the proper entry angle and align the heatshield. 
At 400,000 feet above the Earth’s surface, the craft will make the first contact with the upper atmosphere. 
Traveling nearly 35 times the speed of sound, the crew is expected to experience up to 3.9 G-forces as the craft descends through the atmosphere. 
NASA explained there will be a six-minute planned communications blackout as plasma builds around the capsule. 
At around an altitude of 22,000 feet, the drogue parachutes, which are designed for high speeds, will deploy to slow descent and stabilize the craft. 
They will then release at an altitude of around 6,000 feet, where the three main parachutes will then deploy to reduce Orion’s speed to under 136 mph. 
Slowed down to 20 mph, the capsule will splash down into the Pacific Ocean, completing the 694,481-mile journey to the moon and back. 
The Artemis II crew, consisting of NASA astronauts Reid Wiseman, Victor Glover, Christina Koch and Canadian Space Agency (CSA) astronaut Jeremy Hansen, achieved the historic flyby of the moon on Monday, marking the first-time humans have returned to the lunar body in over 50 years. 
They also broke the record held by Apollo 13 for the farthest mankind has ever gone into space, with Artemis II reaching a maximum distance from Earth of 252,756 miles. 
During their mission, they photographed the moon and completed scientific observations, as well as evaluated Orion’s systems in the deep-space environment. 
This mission precedes expected future missions to land humans on the moon, establish a lunar base, and travel to Mars, according to NASA. 
Stay informed! 
Receive breaking news blasts directly to your inbox for free. 
Subscribe here. https://www.oann.com/alerts 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.4%One America News Network: 4.6%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 2.4%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.2%One America News Network: 3.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.1%Addie Davis: 3.6%One America News Network: 2.9%Overconfidence Bias10.1%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 9.3%One America News Network: 15.3%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.6%One America News Network: 1.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 3.5%Addie Davis: 3.9%One America News Network: 4.3%Optimism Bias3.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.2%One America News Network: 1.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 8.4%One America News Network: 11.8%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.3%One America News Network: 3.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.4%One America News Network: 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.0%One America News Network: 3.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.0%One America News Network: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 3.1%One America News Network: 5.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.3%One America News Network: 2.0%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.7%One America News Network: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.6%One America News Network: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.8%One America News Network: 0.6%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 4.0%One America News Network: 6.3%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.8%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.9%One America News Network: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.5%Addie Davis: 5.9%One America News Network: 5.4%Hasty Generalization4.5%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.5%One America News Network: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 10.5%One America News Network: 10.0%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.0%One America News Network: 1.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.8%One America News Network: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.1%One America News Network: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.6%One America News Network: 1.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 1.0%One America News Network: 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.0%One America News Network: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.2%One America News Network: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 2.5%One America News Network: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.7%One America News Network: 5.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.3%Addie Davis: 2.3%One America News Network: 1.1%Indoctrination0.3%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 0.4%One America News Network: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Addie Davis: 5.9%One America News Network: 3.8%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Addie Davis: 1.8%One America News Network: 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…2.3%

664 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers23%attributed speech512writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageU.S. Geological Survey • 44 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageNASA • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

NASA

21%flagged-word coverage
108 attributed words71% of attributed speech16% writer coverage
0%2.5%5.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -2.9 ptsWriter: 2.9%NASA: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-0.4 ptsWriter: 0.4%NASA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.