Author summary
20% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,029 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noah Haggerty results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 496 hits . Analysis detected 4,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,642 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 21% (4,945 of 6,228 authors). This Noah Haggerty is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group. Noah Haggerty
Author details
Total words: 7,642
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.5% 6.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 0.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Bandwagon: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst