Topic summary
⁠54%5 analyzed articles/videos2,098 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arizona Politics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 2,767 hits. Analysis detected 17,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,968 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,028 of 15,788 topics). This Arizona Politics is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Arizona Politics

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles15K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.5%18.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.0%14.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.2%0.2%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.4%Ad Hominem: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos