Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Zach Buchanan results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 955 hits. Analysis detected 5,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,224 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Zach Buchanan is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Zach Buchanan
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Zach Buchanan (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 7,224
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.8%12.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.2%13.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos