Valley measles outbreak grows: Where you may have been exposed 22%

By Zach Buchanan0%

7/21/2026, 11:22:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Indoctrination, and Unattributed Quote, with Recency Bias as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 579 faulty-reasoning hits from 545 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 35.6% and a BS Rank of 22% (16,192 of 20,518 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 78.90% of the article peer group.

The Maricopa County Department of Public Health has identified 25 positive measles cases in the county since the start of the year, and on Tuesday announced a host of new exposure sites in Chandler and Phoenix. 
That comes on the heels of the department announcing exposure sites in Tempe and Surprise on Friday. 
The most recent exposures have been traced to a non-resident who tested positive for measles, the department said. 
The department has not shared how many positive cases are children and whether any have suffered serious health effects. 
Measles is an incredibly contagious disease that can be especially dangerous to unvaccinated individuals, particularly very young children. 
Two doses of the measles-mumps-rubella vaccine are 97% effective at preventing the disease. 
Twenty-five positive measles cases are the most the county has had since at least 2006, according to data from the Arizona Department of Health Services. 
Maricopa County had no cases last year and two in 2024. 
Before this year, the most the county has seen over the last 20 years was five cases in 2022. 
In total, the state has seen 341 positive measles cases since the start of 2025, most of them concentrated in the Northern Arizona community of Colorado City, a former Fundamentalist Mormon stronghold where vaccination rates are very low. 
Ninety-five percent of cases have been in unvaccinated individuals, and 63% of positive cases have been minors. 
Twenty-five people have required hospitalization, but no one has died in the state due to measles. 
The first exposure sites identified by county health officials were primarily in Gilbert and Queen Creek, with Mesa showing up among exposure sites in May. 
Exposures in Surprise, Phoenix, Tempe and Chandler have been more recent developments. 
Here are the recent sites where you may have been exposed, according to the county health department. 
Health officials say to watch for symptoms  such as a high fever, runny nose and red and splotchy rash  for up to 21 days. 
If you experience symptoms, stay home and call a medical provider. 
| Location | Date/Time | Watch for symptoms through | 
|---|---|---| 
| The Taco Spot<br />885 N. 54th St.<br />Chandler, AZ 85226 | Sunday, July 12<br />2:30 p.m.–5:45 p.m. 
| Sunday, August 2 | 
| Sonesta Select Hotel<br />920 N. 54th St.<br />Chandler, AZ 85226 | Sunday, July 12, 4:00 p.m. <br />to Monday, July 13, 1:00 p.m. 
Monday, August 3 | Monday, August 3 | 
| Chase Field<br />401 E. 
Jefferson St.<br />Phoenix, AZ 85004 | Sunday, July 12<br />7:00 p.m.–midnight | Sunday, August 2 | 
| IHOP<br />5020 E. 
Ray Rd.<br />Phoenix, AZ 85044 | Monday, July 13<br />12:00 a.m.–3:30 a.m. 
| Monday, August 3 | 
| bb.q Chicken<br />1900 W. 
Chandler Blvd.<br />Chandler, AZ 85224 | Monday, July 13<br />11:15 a.m.–2:30 p.m. 
| Monday, August 3 | 
| Chandler Fashion Center<br />3111 W. 
Chandler Blvd.<br />Chandler, AZ 85226 | Monday, July 13<br />12:30 p.m.–4:30 p.m. 
| Monday, August 3 | 
| Tempe Marketplace<br />2000 E. 
Rio Salado Pkwy.<br />Tempe, AZ 85288 | Monday, July 6<br />5:00 p.m.–8:30 p.m. 
| Monday, July 27 | 
| Walmart<br />13770 W. 
Bell Rd.<br />Surprise, AZ 85374 | Sunday, July 12<br />2:00 p.m.–6:00 p.m. 
| Sunday, August 2 | 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.0%Phoenix New Times: 1.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Zach Buchanan: 1.3%Phoenix New Times: 0.6%Anchoring Bias3.5%This article: 11.2%Zach Buchanan: 1.6%Phoenix New Times: 2.3%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 7.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.7%Phoenix New Times: 1.2%Representativeness Heuristic7.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Zach Buchanan: 1.8%Phoenix New Times: 1.0%Overconfidence Bias2.4%This article: 6.8%Zach Buchanan: 2.3%Phoenix New Times: 3.5%Framing Effect6.8%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.9%Zach Buchanan: 1.7%Phoenix New Times: 3.0%Optimism Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.4%Phoenix New Times: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Zach Buchanan: 13.2%Phoenix New Times: 6.7%Negativity Bias8.3%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 2.3%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.8%Phoenix New Times: 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 7.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.0%Phoenix New Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias7.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.4%Phoenix New Times: 2.4%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.7%Zach Buchanan: 2.1%Phoenix New Times: 1.2%Recency Bias11.7%This article: 2.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 4.0%Phoenix New Times: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 2.4%Zach Buchanan: 2.2%Phoenix New Times: 2.4%Appeal to Authority2.4%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.4%Phoenix New Times: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.5%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 5.2%Phoenix New Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 3.4%Phoenix New Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.5%Phoenix New Times: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.3%Zach Buchanan: 2.0%Phoenix New Times: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.3%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.1%Zach Buchanan: 0.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Composition/Division3.1%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.2%Phoenix New Times: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.4%Zach Buchanan: 1.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.4%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.6%Phoenix New Times: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.9%Zach Buchanan: 1.3%Phoenix New Times: 0.9%Unattributed Quote9.9%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 0.2%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 8.8%Zach Buchanan: 12.8%Phoenix New Times: 5.9%Biased Writer Voice8.8%This article: 10.1%Zach Buchanan: 1.6%Phoenix New Times: 2.1%Indoctrination10.1%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 2.5%Phoenix New Times: 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Zach Buchanan: 1.0%Phoenix New Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 3.5%Zach Buchanan: 0.3%Phoenix New Times: 3.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…3.5%

545 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers28%attributed speech393writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageMaricopa County Department of Public Health • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMaricopa County Department of Public Health • 18 words • 100.0% coverageMaricopa County Department of Public Health • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageArizona Department of Health Services • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMaricopa County Department of Public Health • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMaricopa County Department of Public Health • 26 words • 100.0% coverageMaricopa County Department of Public Health • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
87%flagged-word coverage
127 attributed words84% of attributed speech50% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Unattributed Quote+42.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maricopa County Department of Public Health: 42.5%42.5%Indoctrination+24.6 ptsWriter: 4.6%Maricopa County Department of Public Health: 29.1%29.1%Attempt to Sell a Product +15.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Maricopa County Department of Public Health: 15.0%15.0%Biased Writer Voice-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%Maricopa County Department of Public Health: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.