Topic summary
⁠25%2 analyzed articles/videos2,760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Arizona Governor Race results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 6,241 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,384 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (15,911 of 16,562 topics). This Arizona Governor Race is better (less manipulative) than 96.10% of the peer group.
Arizona Governor Race
Topic details
Total words: 12,384
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751003.9% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles12.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos