Topic summary
35% 6 analyzed articles/videos 3,346 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Argentina results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 2,495 hits . Analysis detected 19,172 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,756 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (12,160 of 15,988 topics). This Argentina is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group. Argentina
Topic details
Total words: 19,756
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.9% percentile 2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles19.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 12.6% 12.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst