Topic summary
⁠81%5 analyzed articles/videos1,211 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anniversary results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 1,332 hits. Analysis detected 8,012 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,094 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,739 of 16,562 topics). This Anniversary is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Anniversary
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,094
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.3% percentile
3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles7.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.8%18.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.0%16.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.7%4.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos