Akashi crowd crush victims remembered 25 years on 10%

By No Author44%

7/21/2026, 2:35:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hindsight Bias, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 154 faulty-reasoning hits from 347 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 26.8% and a BS Rank of 10% (19,771 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the article peer group.

Akashi, Hyogo Pref.  Victims of a stampede that occurred at a fireworks event in the city of Akashi, Hyogo Prefecture, were remembered Tuesday, the 25th anniversary of the tragedy. 
Bereaved relatives, local residents and others offered prayers in front of a memorial on a pedestrian overpass where the crowd crush happened July 21, 2001, claiming the lives of 11 people, including nine children. 
The accident at the overpass linking West Japan Railway’s Asagiri Station and the venue of the city-sponsored event left 247 others injured. 
On Friday, four days before the 25th anniversary, Toshihiro Kawaguchi, a professor of Kansai University in Osaka Prefecture, gave a lecture for senior officials of the Akashi Municipal Government, at the invitation of the city. 
“The most important thing is to prevent overcrowding,” Kawaguchi, an expert in crowd safety science and accident prevention, said. 
Takeshi Nakagawa, the city’s chief crisis management official, said, “I once again recognized that the tragedy was a man-made disaster.” 
Seiji Shimomura, 68, who served as head of a now-defunct association of the victims’ families, guided new city employees around the accident site on Tuesday morning. 
“My sorrow and anger remain even after 25 years,” said Shimomura, who lost his 2-year-old second son, Tomohito, in the crowd crush. 
“I want you to foster a culture of safety and security so that the victims’ sacrifice will not be in vain,” he told the attendees. 
The association was disbanded in 2023. 
Over the deadly stampede, five individuals, including a former senior official of Akashi Police Station responsible for crowd control and a city government executive, were convicted of professional negligence resulting in death and injury. 
The then-deputy chief of the police station, who initially avoided indictment, became the first person in Japan to have been forcibly indicted based on a prosecution inquest panel’s decision. 
In 2016, however, the Supreme Court, upholding lower court rulings, decided to terminate the trial for the former deputy chief without handing down a guilty or not-guilty ruling, due to the expiration of the statute of limitations. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%No Author: 3.2%The Japan Times: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.6%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 3.9%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.4%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias8.4%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.6%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 11.2%The Japan Times: 14.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 7.2%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.9%Loss Aversion7.2%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.8%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 4.7%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 2.4%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%No Author: 9.6%The Japan Times: 11.6%Negativity Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.8%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.9%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.5%No Author: 4.8%The Japan Times: 5.5%Appeal to Authority5.5%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.0%The Japan Times: 1.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 3.0%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.5%No Author: 3.6%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion13.5%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 3.4%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.6%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.7%The Japan Times: 1.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 2.3%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 5.3%The Japan Times: 4.6%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 2.1%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 6.3%The Japan Times: 9.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 1.4%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%No Author: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

347 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers25%attributed speech261writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageToshihiro Kawaguchi • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTakeshi Nakagawa • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSeiji Shimomura • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSeiji Shimomura • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Seiji Shimomura

100%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words55% of attributed speech24% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.