Topic summary
⁠71%5 analyzed articles/videos1,102 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Safety results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.6% saturation with 1,218 hits. Analysis detected 7,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,561 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (7,765 of 16,562 topics). This Safety is worse (more manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Safety
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,561
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510053.1% percentile
3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.9%9.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 4.5%4.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos