Topic summary
⁠0%3 analyzed articles/videos859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angelina Jolie results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.6% saturation with 872 hits. Analysis detected 6,964 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,080 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (11,542 of 16,562 topics). This Angelina Jolie is better (less manipulative) than 69.70% of the peer group.
Angelina Jolie
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 9,080
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.3% percentile
2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.1%7.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos