Brad Pitt’s family divide deepens as another daughter files to drop his last name 20%

By Carsen Holaday0%

6/10/2026, 10:58:24 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 22.5% saturation with 121 hits. Analysis detected 734 faulty-reasoning hits from 538 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of 20% (17,545 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 80.20% of the article peer group.

Another one of Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt’s children has filed to officially remove Pitt from their last name. 
Zahara Marley Jolie-Pitt is the latest to drop her father’s last name from her own after her eldest brother Maddox and younger sibling Shiloh made the same move, distancing themselves from the famous actor. 
The name change documents were filed April 28 in the Superior Court of California, coming just days after Maddox’s filing, according to documents first obtained by In Touch magazine. 
At her graduation ceremony weeks later, Zahara’s name was read as Zahara Marley Jolie when she accepted her diploma onstage at Spelman College in Atlanta in May. 
A source close to Pitt told The Independent, “It’s sad to see one parent alienate their children from the other.” 
Shiloh, a dancer and the former couple’s first biological child, was the first of the siblings to be granted a name change on their 18th birthday in 2024 and now goes by Shiloh Jolie. 
Maddox’s name change made headlines earlier this year, when his decision to just be called Maddox Jolie was revealed in the credits for Angelina’s recent film Couture, on which he worked as an assistant director. 
Zahara’s decision to drop Pitt goes back as early as November 2023, when she introduced herself as simply Zahara Marley Jolie in an introduction video for the Mu Pi chapter of the Alpha Kappa Alpha sorority at her university. 
In the video, she was seen dancing with her sorority sisters before introducing herself: “My name is Zahara Marley Jolie. 
And [I] landed all the way from the Golden State in the city full of angels: Los Angeles, California.” 
In May 2024, Vivienne was also credited as only Vivienne Jolie, instead of Vivienne Jolie-Pitt, in a Playbill for The Outsiders  a Broadway play she helped her mom produce. 
The family divide came after a 2016 airplane incident in which Pitt allegedly got into a heated argument with his wife and children. 
Following an FBI investigation into child abuse allegations after the incident, Pitt was cleared of all charges. 
However, a detailed account of what transpired on the private plane was made public record during the pair’s divorce proceedings. 
According to the documents, Angelina told investigators that Pitt’s behavior on a private flight from France to Los Angeles frightened their children, who were between the ages of eight and 15 at the time. 
The Maleficent actor alleged that Pitt lunged at one of their children and that she had to hold him back “in a choke hold.” 
She filed for divorce the day after the incident. 
In 2023, a years-old scathing Father’s Day post reportedly from Pax’s private Instagram account emerged in which he reportedly said to his adoptive dad: “Happy Father’s Day to this world class a***hole. 
You time and time and again prove yourself to be a terrible and despicable person.” 
Pax, who was 16 at the time of the post, also reportedly wrote, “You have made the lives of those closest to me a constant hell. 
You may tell yourself and the world whatever you want, but the truth will come to light someday.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 2.1%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 8.9%Carsen Holaday: 0.7%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias8.9%This article: 12.3%Carsen Holaday: 4.3%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic12.3%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.6%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.9%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 2.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.7%Carsen Holaday: 3.3%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.9%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.3%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 22.5%Carsen Holaday: 6.7%The Independent: 12.2%Negativity Bias22.5%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.3%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.5%Carsen Holaday: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias4.5%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.4%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 3.5%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.4%Carsen Holaday: 1.5%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias8.4%This article: 6.5%Carsen Holaday: 0.7%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect6.5%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 1.0%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 3.7%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.4%The Independent: 1.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 6.3%Carsen Holaday: 3.6%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization6.3%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.1%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.5%Carsen Holaday: 2.6%The Independent: 6.5%Appeal to Emotion4.5%This article: 3.3%Carsen Holaday: 0.3%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question3.3%This article: 13.2%Carsen Holaday: 4.7%The Independent: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)13.2%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.4%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.5%Carsen Holaday: 3.7%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal14.5%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.1%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.4%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 14.5%Carsen Holaday: 4.1%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote14.5%This article: 9.7%Carsen Holaday: 2.1%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection9.7%This article: 3.7%Carsen Holaday: 6.7%The Independent: 7.8%Biased Writer Voice3.7%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.2%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.0%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Carsen Holaday: 0.6%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

538 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers14%attributed speech462writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageZahara Marley Jolie • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageAngelina Jolie • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coveragePax • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coveragePax • 18 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Angelina Jolie

100%flagged-word coverage
24 attributed words32% of attributed speech56% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote-16.9 ptsWriter: 16.9%Angelina Jolie: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Angelina Jolie: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-4.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Angelina Jolie: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.