Keyword summary
30%2 analyzed articles/videos1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vivienne Jolie Pitt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 548 hits. Analysis detected 3,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (21,362 of 34,797 keywords). This Vivienne Jolie Pitt is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Vivienne Jolie Pitt
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
39%Vivienne Jolie Pitt (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510038.6% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate