Keyword summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,394 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vivienne Jolie Pitt results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 548 hits . Analysis detected 3,808 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 39% (21,362 of 34,797 keywords). This Vivienne Jolie Pitt is better (less manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Vivienne Jolie Pitt
Keyword details
Total words: 4,720
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
39% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 38.6% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.6% 11.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst