Keyword summary
43% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Pitt results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.4% saturation with 1,655 hits . Analysis detected 8,145 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,492 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 34% (23,646 of 35,444 keywords). This Brad Pitt is better (less manipulative) than 66.70% of the peer group. Brad Pitt
Keyword details
Total words: 9,492
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 33.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst