Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos859 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brad Pitt results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 502 hits. Analysis detected 2,239 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,436 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (8,763 of 16,562 topics). This Brad Pitt is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group.
Brad Pitt
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,436
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

47% percentile
025507510047.1% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.2%11.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.6%14.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos