Keyword summary
42% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angelina Jolie results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,506 hits . Analysis detected 12,635 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,152 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (25,985 of 34,791 keywords). This Angelina Jolie is better (less manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group. Angelina Jolie
Keyword details
Total words: 14,152
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.3% percentile 2.0% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst