Topic summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 14,556 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alabama results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.7% saturation with 2,995 hits . Analysis detected 20,566 faulty-reasoning hits from 44,949 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 1% (15,335 of 15,447 topics). This Alabama is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group. Alabama
Topic details
Total words: 44,949
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.7% percentile 1.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles44.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst