Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nic White results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 800 hits . Analysis detected 5,722 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,561 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,347 of 6,316 authors). This Nic White is better (less manipulative) than 68.80% of the peer group. Nic White
Author details
Total words: 8,561
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.2% 7.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.3% 9.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 4.0% 4.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst