Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wilko Martinez-cachero results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Anecdotal , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 625 hits . Analysis detected 3,706 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,518 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,207 of 6,628 authors). This Wilko Martinez-cachero is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Wilko Martinez-cachero
Author details
Total words: 5,518
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.9% 7.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.3% 11.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8% Red Herring: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst