Topic summary
⁠61%3 analyzed articles/videos1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Aging Population results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 566 hits. Analysis detected 4,517 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,481 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (9,358 of 15,759 topics). This Aging Population is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Aging Population
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,481
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos