Author summary
0%18 analyzed articles/videos3,665 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jessica Speed results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.5% saturation with 1,339 hits. Analysis detected 12,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,670 analyzed words across 18 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,158 of 6,316 authors). This Jessica Speed is better (less manipulative) than 81.70% of the peer group.
Jessica Speed
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
19%Jessica Speed (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 20,670
Article count: 18
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

18% percentile
025507510018.3% percentile
1.7% BS Score18 analyzed articles20.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 5.7%5.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate