Author summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 2,901 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kanako Takahara results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,273 hits . Analysis detected 10,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,026 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,564 of 6,359 authors). This Kanako Takahara is better (less manipulative) than 56.00% of the peer group. Kanako Takahara
Author details
Total words: 12,026
Article count: 11
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score11 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.9% 9.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.0%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst