Rice consumption in fiscal 2025 the lowest in seven years ⁠70%

By Jessica Speed⁠0%

5/27/2026, 5:30:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 47.5% saturation with 58 hits. Analysis detected 366 faulty-reasoning hits from 122 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 62.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (6,515 of 21,175 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the article peer group.

Rice consumption in Japan fell to its lowest level in seven years in fiscal 2025, as soaring prices pushed more consumers toward cheaper staples such as bread and noodles. 
Average monthly rice consumption declined 6.1% from the previous year to 4.435 kilograms per person, according to a consumer survey released by an industry-backed Japanese body that tracks supply-demand trends for the staple. 
The drop is equivalent to about 4.4 bowls of rice per person over the course of the year, based on a standard serving size of 65 grams of rice. 
The nationwide survey, conducted online via a self-administered questionnaire, estimated at-home rice consumption based on household inventories, purchases and family size. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.4%The Japan Times: 3.5%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 23.8%Jessica Speed: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.9%Anchoring Bias23.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 3.9%The Japan Times: 4.7%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 44.3%Jessica Speed: 1.8%The Japan Times: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic44.3%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 27.0%Jessica Speed: 0.7%The Japan Times: 2.0%Overconfidence Bias27.0%This article: 47.5%Jessica Speed: 6.5%The Japan Times: 14.3%Framing Effect47.5%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.2%The Japan Times: 0.8%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 2.9%The Japan Times: 4.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 2.8%The Japan Times: 3.3%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.8%Jessica Speed: 5.7%The Japan Times: 11.5%Negativity Bias23.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.2%The Japan Times: 0.8%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.1%The Japan Times: 1.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.5%The Japan Times: 1.5%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 8.2%Jessica Speed: 1.4%The Japan Times: 2.2%Recency Bias8.2%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.5%The Japan Times: 0.9%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 27.0%Jessica Speed: 4.8%The Japan Times: 5.6%Appeal to Authority27.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.5%The Japan Times: 1.6%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.6%The Japan Times: 1.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 2.7%The Japan Times: 4.5%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.6%The Japan Times: 3.6%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.9%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 23.8%Jessica Speed: 2.9%The Japan Times: 4.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)23.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.4%The Japan Times: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.3%The Japan Times: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.3%The Japan Times: 1.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 23.8%Jessica Speed: 2.0%The Japan Times: 3.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)23.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 1.4%The Japan Times: 4.5%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.7%The Japan Times: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 23.8%Jessica Speed: 4.3%The Japan Times: 8.9%Biased Writer Voice23.8%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 3.8%The Japan Times: 1.6%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.1%The Japan Times: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jessica Speed: 0.0%The Japan Times: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 27.0%Jessica Speed: 1.0%The Japan Times: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…27.0%

122 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.