Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,284 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rice results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,135 hits . Analysis detected 13,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,136 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,396 of 36,710 keywords). This Rice is better (less manipulative) than 58.30% of the peer group. Rice
Keyword details
Total words: 13,136
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst