Topic summary
⁠20%2 analyzed articles/videos1,581 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Food Prices results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Recency Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 565 hits. Analysis detected 3,076 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,865 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,780 of 16,562 topics). This Food Prices is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group.
Food Prices
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,865
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

35% percentile
025507510034.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.5%11.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.6%, sitewide 3.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos