Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Rice Consumption results contain 13 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Representativeness Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 116 hits. Analysis detected 658 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠93% (1,214 of 16,562 topics). This Rice Consumption is worse (more manipulative) than 92.70% of the peer group.
Rice Consumption
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

93% percentile
025507510092.7% percentile
10.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles488 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 15.4%15.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 20.3%20.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 11.9%11.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.9%11.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 6.8%6.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.9%5.9%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 23.8%23.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 10.3%10.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 6.8%6.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 19.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 11.9%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 5.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos