Topic summary
⁠25%4 analyzed articles/videos3,409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Abuse Allegations results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 2,574 hits. Analysis detected 15,332 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,575 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (11,953 of 15,327 topics). This Abuse Allegations is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group.
Abuse Allegations

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

22% percentile
025507510022.0% percentile
2.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.4%4.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 14.7%14.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos