Speaker summary
⁠71%5 analyzed articles/videos111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Zack Polanski results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 45% saturation with 94 hits. Analysis detected 457.628 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 22.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠36% (18,188 of 28,364 speakers). This Zack Polanski is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Zack Polanski
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510035.9% percentile
22.2% BS Score5 analyzed videos111 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 33.5%33.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 36.4%36.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.0%45.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.1%37.1%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 14.3%14.3%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 11.5%11.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 36.4%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Speaker 33.5%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 0.2%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos