Speaker summary
⁠26%3 analyzed articles/videos189 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Yellowstone National Park results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Indoctrination, and Loss Aversion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 41.218 hits. Analysis detected 122.218 faulty-reasoning hits from 189 analyzed words across 3 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 11.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,216 of 28,364 speakers). This Yellowstone National Park is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group.
Yellowstone National Park
Speaker details
Total words: 189
Content count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

15% percentile
025507510014.6% percentile
11.4% BS Score3 analyzed videos189 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 16.0%16.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 15.3%15.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos