Speaker summary
⁠67%4 analyzed articles/videos276 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WSJ results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 70 hits. Analysis detected 256 faulty-reasoning hits from 276 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 13.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (23,117 of 28,364 speakers). This WSJ is better (less manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
WSJ
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 276
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.5% percentile
13.3% BS Score4 analyzed videos276 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 6.9%6.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 25.4%25.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos