Speaker summary
58%8 analyzed articles/videos260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These World Weather Attribution results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 44.6% saturation with 115.621 hits. Analysis detected 535.485 faulty-reasoning hits from 260 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 16.6% and a BS Rank of 26% (21,111 of 28,364 speakers). This World Weather Attribution is better (less manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

26% percentile
025507510025.6% percentile
16.6% BS Score8 analyzed videos260 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 24.2%24.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 17.1%17.1%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 8.8%8.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 8.1%8.1%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 8.8%8.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 8.1%8.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 24.2%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 17.1%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 0.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.8%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 8.1%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate