Speaker summary
67% 8 analyzed articles/videos 722.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wesley Bell results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Halo Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 287.328 hits . Analysis detected 1,488.12 faulty-reasoning hits from 722.333 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (25,497 of 26,458 speakers). This Wesley Bell is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Wesley Bell
Speaker details
Total words: 722.333
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 5.9% BS Score8 analyzed videos722.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 32.8% 32.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 5.3% 5.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 6.1% 6.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 6.6% 6.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 7.0% 7.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 15.7% 15.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 15.9% Framing Effect: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.0%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 6.1%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst