Speaker summary
72% 4 analyzed articles/videos 196.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vern Buchanan results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Status Quo Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 37.8% saturation with 91.205 hits . Analysis detected 586.085 faulty-reasoning hits from 196.333 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.4% and a BS Rank of 35% (18,578 of 28,364 speakers). This Vern Buchanan is better (less manipulative) than 65.50% of the peer group. Vern Buchanan
Speaker details
Total words: 196.333
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.5% percentile 21.4% BS Score4 analyzed videos196.3 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 28.1% 28.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 26.3% 26.3% Status Quo Bias Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 22.9% 22.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Speaker 18.7% 18.7% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 19.9% 19.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 13.6% 13.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 28.7% 28.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 37.8% 37.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 9.8% 9.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 28.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 26.3%, sitewide 4.6% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 22.9%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 1.7% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 18.7%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 13.6%, sitewide 0.8% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst