Author summary
52% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,039 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alice Gibbs results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 3,548 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,139 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,894 of 6,628 authors). This Alice Gibbs is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Alice Gibbs
Author details
Total words: 5,139
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.3% percentile 2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.6% 10.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.2% 7.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.4%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.0% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst